February 12, 2012, 08:44:15 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The 1st wedge rule DQ gone wrong. Updated w/Part3  (Read 1237 times)
kiwi
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +35/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
New Zealand New Zealand

Posts: 2816



« on: July 27, 2010, 02:55:48 AM »

http://www.golfweek.com/news/2010/jul/26/nonconforming-wedge-dqs-futures-player/

Sarah Brown’s chance for her first professional victory ended in an apparent case of mistaken identity.

Brown, 18, who was three shots off the lead entering the final round of the Duramed Futures Tour’s The International at Concord, was disqualified July 25 after a rules official determined her wedges to have nonconforming grooves.

In a statement to Golfweek, Ping said Brown’s 54-degree Tour-W wedge conforms to the U.S. Golf Association’s 2010 “conditions of competition.”

“Unfortunately, Sarah Brown was the victim of an inaccurate ruling regarding the conformity of her Ping Tour-W wedge,” Ping chairman & CEO John Solheim said. “The wedge is properly identified as conforming to the 2010 “New Groove Rule.” This has been confirmed by the USGA.

“We’re disappointed that the rules officials at the Futures Tour event took the action they did without properly investigating the situation. We’ve received an apology from the Futures Tour and more importantly, they’ll be apologizing to Sarah for the mistake."

David Higdon, the LPGA's chief communications officer said, “We ultimately made a mistake in the disqualification. (Duramed Futures Tour CEO) Zayra Calderon has called Sarah and apologized. We will work over the next couple days to determine where the miscommunication happened, and make sure it never happens again.”

An anonymous person informed a rules official earlier in the round that Brown may be using wedges with nonconforming grooves. The official, whose identity could not be obtained by Golfweek, consulted the U.S. Golf Association’s Web site before determining the wedges were nonconforming. Instead of allowing Brown to complete her round as the matter was further investigated, the official removed her from the golf course.

Brown was using a Ping Tour-W wedge with 54 degrees of loft. Some models of the wedge do not conform with the new grooves rules, but Brown’s wedge conforms because the letters ‘XG’ were stamped on the hosel (‘X’ is the Roman numeral for 10, i.e. 2010, while ‘G’ stands for ‘grooves’).

“There’s nothing that can be done to rectify the situation,” said Sarah Brown’s father, Keith. “It’s not that (the rules official) made a mistake. Everyone makes mistakes. It was the arrogance to say, ‘I’m pulling her off the course.’ I said, ‘Let her finish the round and check with the USGA.’ ”

Brown was 2 over par for the final round when she was disqualified, and 3 under par for the tournament. Former U.S. Girls’ Junior champ Jenny Shin won the tournament with an 11-under 205. With a solid back nine – the easier side at Beaver Meadow Golf Course, according to Keith Brown – Sarah Brown could have collected the best finish of her professional career.

Brown, 18, a rookie on the Futures Tour, was an AJGA first-team All-American in 2009. She’d made four of seven cuts before The International, with a best finish of T-21. Brown has earned $2,921 and ranks 106th in earnings.

The new grooves are smaller and have rounded edges; the old grooves are larger, with sharper edges. The new groove specifications were adopted to prevent players from obtaining optimal spin from the rough. According to the USGA, the new grooves do not affect spin from the fairway.

Players in professional events have been mandated to use clubs with the new grooves since Jan. 1, 2010.

This isn’t the first incident surrounding Ping wedges and the new grooves. Erynne Lee, a 17-year-old amateur from Silverdale, Wash., was disqualified from U.S. Women’s Open sectional qualifying because two of her wedges did not conform.

Lee was allowed to complete her round, eventually winning a playoff over Christine Wong, but was disqualified after the round. Wong took Lee’s place at Oakmont. Lee’s non-conforming wedges were Ping Tour-W wedges of 56 and 60 degrees.

Then there was the flap over the Ping Eye 2 wedge earlier this year on the PGA Tour. Ping wedges made before April 1, 1990, are approved for competition because of a 1990 settlement from a Ping lawsuit against the USGA. Phil Mickelson was among the players to use the wedges in competition earlier this year. At the Farmers Insurance Open in late January at Torrey Pines, fellow Tour player Scott McCarron said Mickelson was cheating for using the club.

Ping eventually waived its rights that prevented the Tour from prohibiting the use of Ping Eye 2 irons and wedges that do not meet the 2010 condition of competition from being used at PGA Tour events.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2010, 04:42:30 AM by kiwi » Logged

All golf clubs are inherently evil.
finner
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +7/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 922


The pleasures of jalapeno pizza!


« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2010, 08:17:54 AM »

What harm would it have done to let her finish?  None.  Dumba**es!
Logged

Driver: 10.5* Nike SQ Machspeed X Flex
1 Iron, Cobra, Dynamic Gold X200, -1/2
Irons: 3-PW Cally X Forged, Project X 6.5, -1/2
Wdgs: 52* Cally Vintage X Forged MD
          56* Cally Vintage X Forged MD
          60* Cally Vintage X Forged MD C grind
Putter:  Taylor Made Corza Ghost, 34"
Ball:  Titleist NXT Tour
Covert Cooler on both sides of bag filled with beer!
mr_divots
Independent Equipment Reviewer
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +216/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 11866


Keeping all bag options open. Always.


« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2010, 09:11:54 AM »

Funny how this all seemingly surrounds Ping wedges. Their wedges seem to be gaining in popularity (rightly so, they are great.)
What a joke that "officials" can't even look for conforming stamps on a wedge AFTER the round is over. Imagine if they were put in charge of actually measuring the grooves.  big_giggle Tells me there is a nice opportunity for an unscrupulous player to put "conforming" stamps on their wedges and get away with it.  Roll Eyes No one would, apparently, be able to tell the difference.  zchange

How many rounds of 59 have been shot or sniffed at this year?? Thank GOODNESS for the new grooves!  Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: July 27, 2010, 09:13:00 AM by mr_divots » Logged
NewJerichoMan
The Poster F/K/A Knuckles
Acumen
GDS Guru
*

MoJo: +378/-2
Online Online

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 10722


Wait 'til Augusta


« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2010, 09:33:38 AM »

How many rounds of 59 have been shot or sniffed at this year?? Thank GOODNESS for the new grooves!  Roll Eyes


Straight from PGATour.com, "In the past three months, we've seen a 59 from Paul Goydos, two 60s (Carl Pettersson and Steve Stricker) and a 61 (Cameron Beckman).  And there have been 11 61s this season. Yikes! Seems like a run on low numbers, right?  Last year the season totals were one 60, nine 61s and 33 62s."

I think overall, scoring is higher than last year though despite the recent spate of low numbers.

Wasn't the USGA suppose to release their findings on the groove change after the US Open?  In response to the Bomb & Gouge article which showed through this time last year that scoring from the rough, proximity to the hole from the rough, was actually improved?

 
Logged
Jim Clark
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +15/-1
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 927



« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2010, 11:33:37 AM »

Unbelievable how stupid some rules officials can be. First, he listened to an "anonymous" source, I can't see how it would be other than a fellow competitor. It said he consulted the USGA website before the DQ. Either the USGA had bad or incomplete information or he misinterpreted what he saw.

To pull her off the course was the ultimate in stupidity. What possible harm was there in letting her finish and then getting clarification.

The anonymous source and rules official should be identified.

She should also be compensated as if she finished at 3 under.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2010, 11:37:45 AM by Jim Clark » Logged
Captain Joesterio
HO Extraordinaire
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +2012/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
Cyprus Cyprus

Posts: 7446


My Bag Will Never Be Set!!


« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2010, 12:10:10 PM »

What a stupid decision to not let her finish.

Seems like the rules officials need to know their equipment...and if not like has already been mentioned, let her finish then make the ruling.  Sounds like the rules offical was intimidated by the anon source or else has a napoleon syndrome.  "Im in charge here...get off my course!!"

Logged

Golf is deceptively simple yet endlessly complicated.  It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect.  It is at the same time both rewarding and maddening--it is without a doubt the greatest game mankind has ever invented Adams 9016D with PM702, Wishon 949 speeder 952 X, adams idea pro 18 RADIX 90X, adams 20 proGold/X-con, Muiria Combo cavity blade set with Nippon super peening blues X  , leading edge grind Scratch 53 Nippon Proto Wedge shaft, leading edge grind Scratch  58 Nippon Proto Wedge Shaft, TP mills black carbon softtail short-neck
pickerjohn
Weekend Golfer
*

MoJo: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 46



« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2010, 04:57:58 PM »

Absolutely horrible to pull her off the course, I would hate
to think it was a personal vendetta by the rat source or
the overzealous offical, but it stinks. She should be compensated
other than just a "we're sorry".
Logged

TM Superquad 10.5 Stiff
TEE CB1 15* & 18* reg.
Adams 7 wood Reg.
Scratch EZ-1 5-PW Nippon 850 Reg.
Scratch 53* & 60* Smoke finish
Callaway X Forges Vintage 64*
Yes Tracy & Odyssey White Steel #1
Divot Dan
Acumen
GDS Guru
*

MoJo: +115/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
Mexico Mexico

Posts: 2403


El Bandito de Golf


« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2010, 05:27:50 PM »

The officials involved should be suspended and their punishment noted to all others at every USGA event.
Logged

Keep a buffalo in your mind to graze on the prairie of your discontent.
br61
Administrator
GDS Guru
*

MoJo: +174/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 6463



« Reply #8 on: July 27, 2010, 05:51:12 PM »

Me thinks this official should be tied up in nearest tree and flogged by Sarah, after exposing his name on internet so everyone can call him names too. He should not be allowed to work in any tournaments ever again.

I still do not understand why he did not allow her to finish her tournament round as 99.99875685237% of rules officials are trained for that, so that rules officials can sort out what happened afterwards.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2010, 05:53:59 PM by br61 » Logged

br61's bag full of TM and Adams hackin' utensils

TM R11 TP 9* w/Kai'li 60 stiff
Adams F12 LS 9.5* w/GD Tour AD DJ-6x
TM R11 TP 14* & 19* w/Motore F3 80 stiff
TM Rescue 11 TP 21* & 23.5* w/PX6.0
TM 2011 MC 5-W w/S300
Adams Pro A12 4-W w/PXi 6.0
TM xFT 54* & 60* w/non conforming grooves(screw USGA)
Is there a putter out there that actually likes me??

A member of couple Hackin' Hall of Shame
kiwi
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +35/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
New Zealand New Zealand

Posts: 2816



« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2010, 01:12:54 AM »

Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse, it does.   

http://www.golfweek.com/news/2010/jul/27/futures-tour-sorry-dq-vows-changes/

The Duramed Futures Tour will make “significant changes’’ after rookie pro Sarah Brown was wrongly disqualified in a ruling about her Ping Tour-W wedge grooves, Zayra Calderon, the tour’s chief executive officer, told Golfweek on Tuesday.

“I have called Sarah, and I have called her father,” Calderon said. “Not only have I apologized to Sarah and Keith, but I have told them how much we appreciate the way they have handled the situation. They have been gracious and honorable about it.”

Calderon outlined general changes in the area of equipment rules: “We have to make sure something like this doesn’t happen again. We went back to talk to the USGA, and we went back to Ping to make sure we are doing everything we can to provide the rules officials with the latest, most up-to-date information. This is an opportunity for improvement, and we are on it.’’

Brown, 18, of Lopatcong, N.J., was three strokes off the lead Sunday as she headed into the final round of The International at Concord, a Duramed Futures Tour event in Concord, N.H.

Two over par at the turn, she was disqualified and removed from the course when rules officials Jim Linyard and Kelly Wergin deemed one of Brown’s wedges to be nonconforming. After consulting the U.S. Golf Association’s Web site, they ruled that Brown’s 54-degree Ping Tour-W wedge did not conform to the 2010 condition of competition requiring new smaller grooves.

However, the wedge was stamped with an “XG” on the hosel (“X’’ indicating the Roman numeral 10 to signify 2010 and “G’’ for grooves), and the Web site indeed showed the wedge to be conforming. The wedge in question is the fifth of five Tour-W 54/10 (54 degrees of loft, 10 degrees of bounce) wedges listed on the Web site.

Golfweek was unable to reach Linyard or Wergin for comment.

Had Brown been allowed to finish her round, officials would have had more than two hours while she played to make a definitive ruling.

Brown has made four cuts in eight events this season and earned $2,921 to rank 106th.

“From a procedural perspective, we have to make sure our rules officials do not make a hasty decision,’’ Calderon said. “We need to stay in contact with LPGA rules officials or the USGA. This is something I would have liked to have happened, but it didn’t. We regret the mistake. The rules official in this case did not pursue other options available to him. It is too bad he didn’t step back and determine whether he had all the information to make that decision.

“Most of the time, rulings are black and white. These lists of conforming and nonconforming clubs are more complex. This is truly new territory.”

Asked about contact with Calderon, Keith Brown said, “Yes, she actually called Sarah twice and me once. She indicated that (LPGA commissioner) Mike Whan might be calling us. (As of Tuesday night, he hadn’t. Many LPGA officials are in England for the Ricoh Women’s British Open.) She has expressed a lot of concern over what happened.”

On June 3, Erynne Lee was disqualified after having won a sectional qualifier for the U.S. Women’s Open. Lee, 16, was not officially DQ’d until days after having completed her round, after the wedge (coincidentally, another Ping Tour-W) was sent to USGA headquarters in Far Hills, N.J., for inspection.

Dick Rugge, the USGA’s senior technical director, said then in explaining the action: “You always have to get all the facts.”

In Brown’s case, a groove testing apparatus was on site but was never used.

“I asked him (Linyard) what he would do if he was wrong,” said Keith Brown, who was caddying for his daughter. “What if he disqualified Sarah and later found out he was wrong? How would he rectify that? He refused to answer. He said: ‘The club is illegal. Sarah is disqualified.’ That was it. It was like giving someone the death penalty on hearsay.”

Linyard and Wergin are fulltime rules officials for the Duramed Futures Tour, which has been the developmental tour for the LPGA since 1999. Wergin carries the title of head rules official.

“Our rules officials are dedicated to their jobs,” Calderon said. “Because the equipment rules are so complex, we had the USGA come to the tour and spend several days with our rules officials. We also have an LPGA rules official who oversees the Duramed Futures Tour rules officials.”

Calderon expressed great concern for Brown.

“When a player is affected in a negative way, we take it very, very much to heart,” she said. “That is so contrary to what we are dedicating ourselves to. It is important for Sarah to continue to play, to continue to get better and better.”

The reaction among the golf community was swift. Ping CEO John Solheim made several phone calls to help clarify the situation and establish a protocol for future disputes.

“This incident surprises me,” said Jim Gibbons, former executive director of the Oregon Golf Association and a rules official at the U.S. Women’s Open and U.S. Senior Open in 2010. “At any tournament, you need to have a procedure of invoking the rules, for ensuring that all rules are being followed.”

Most major professional tours implemented the condition of competition on Jan. 1. However, the Futures Tour, with a nod to the difficulty that some of its players had in obtaining clubs with the new grooves, delayed the rule until July.

At this point, there has been no discussion about a financial payment to Brown.

“She had averaged 4 under on the back nine,” her father said. “I pleaded with them to let her finish the round. She had a real shot at a top 5 or even a top 3. Instead, they held up play for probably 20 minutes. They were sitting in a golf cart with a laptop. A crowd was gathering. Sarah was sobbing the whole time. It was a circus.”

Linyard reportedly decided to examine Brown’s clubs midway into the round after being notified by another player that Brown might be using at least one nonforming wedge.

“The rules official came up when Sarah was on the ninth green,” said her father. “He started pulling clubs from her bag. She had a 10-foot birdie putt on 9, and she could see him pulling the clubs because he was directly on her line. She burned the edge of the cup on 8, and she did it again on 9. She was ready to play the back.”

Keith Brown, a former mortgage banker who has not had a job for the last year and a half, said his daughter was “devastated and sobbing uncontrollably on the course, but she impressed the heck out of me. By the time we got to the clubhouse, she was dignified and she was courteous. We knew they were wrong, but she kept herself under control.”

Sarah Brown is the second of nine children. She was home-schooled and blossomed as a golfer in 2008, when she went unbeaten in a 22-2 victory by the U.S. Junior Ryder Cup team over Europe.

“She’s the same old Sarah,” her father mused. “It’s been two days now (since the disqualification), and she actually laughed about a couple of things that happened.




What in the hell was Jim Linyard the rules official who started this debacle thinking. How can you be a rules a official at a Pro Tour event and not even understand normal procedures. And the worst being the other official was the boss, and they are fulltime employees, not volunteers. If I did something this dumb at work I would have been fired later that day.
Logged
Jim Clark
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +15/-1
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 927



« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2010, 06:13:56 AM »

The Brown's have been MORE than gracious, I'm not sure I'd be so understanding. If it were my daughter, I'd be ripping mad and demand compensation including that the money be counted in her official earnings. The two rules officials should be canned, pulling her off the course was an inexcusable action.

I still want to know who the anonymous snitch was.
Logged
mr_divots
Independent Equipment Reviewer
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +216/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 11866


Keeping all bag options open. Always.


« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2010, 09:44:42 AM »

Quote
Most of the time, rulings are black and white. These lists of conforming and nonconforming clubs are more complex. This is truly new territory.

Gosh. If you can't look at a list and see if a club is on it or not, what does that leave you qualified to do in the "real world?"
Could you even flip burgers? After all, there is a big MENU to consult.  sad boy

"Not black and white." Please...  Roll Eyes zchange
Logged
rlheiman
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +83/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1359



WWW
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2010, 09:59:13 AM »

What about the  fellow player (who was probably losing) calling out that she had non-conforming grooves?  Seems pretty low to me.  

  
« Last Edit: July 28, 2010, 10:55:48 AM by rlheiman » Logged
Divot Dan
Acumen
GDS Guru
*

MoJo: +115/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
Mexico Mexico

Posts: 2403


El Bandito de Golf


« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2010, 10:40:27 AM »

All the clowns involved in the decision to DQ Brown should be fired. In this so-called gentleman's game, there is no place for an official destroying etiquette by rummaging through Sarah's bag while she's putting in an official tournament. If i were her dad, I would've kicked Linyard's ass for even just touching Sarah's golf bag.
Logged
kiwi
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +35/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
New Zealand New Zealand

Posts: 2816



« Reply #14 on: July 29, 2010, 04:40:09 AM »

Part 3 The Payoff

http://www.golfweek.com/news/2010/jul/28/dqd-rookie-futures-tour-2k-not-enough/


Sarah Brown, the Duramed Futures Tour rookie wrongly disqualified from last week’s event, has been offered $2,000 by the tour for its mistake. However, her father told Golfweek that she deserves more.

Brown’s father, Keith, said Wednesday that Zayra Calderon, the tour’s chief executive officer, proposed $2,000 as compensation. Tour officials would not confirm any offer but said they have apologized to Sarah Brown and her father, which the Browns confirmed. The amount would cover Brown’s entry fees for the final four events of the year.

Brown, 18, of Lopatcong, N.J., was removed from the course with nine holes remaining in last week’s The International at Concord in New Hampshire after a rules official determined that she was using a wedge with nonconforming grooves.


The Browns claimed that the wedge was conforming. It turned out they were correct: the wedge, a Ping Tour-W, is on the U.S. Golf Association’s list of wedges that comply with the 2010 condition of competition regarding grooves.

A player usually is allowed to finish the round when there is a questionable ruling that may result in disqualification. That way, the player’s score can stand if the ruling is not upheld.

“It’s not that (the rules official) made a mistake,” Keith Brown said. “Everyone makes mistakes. It was the arrogance to say, ‘I’m pulling her off the course.’ ”

The rules officials, identified as Jim Linyard and Kelly Wergin, are employees of the Duramed Futures Tour. Golfweek has been unable to reach them for comment. Futures Tour officials would not disclose whether any disciplinary action has been taken against them.

Keith Brown said he is not satisfied with the tour’s compensation. “It’s like punching someone in the nose and taking their wallet,” Keith Brown said. “The tour wants to return the wallet and say, ‘I’m sorry.’ What about the punch in the nose?”

The Browns are asking for:

• $5,638, the amount Sarah Brown would’ve earned had she finished The International at Concord at 8-under 208. She was 3 under par for the event when she was removed from the golf course with nine holes remaining.

• A waiver of the entry fee to 2010 LPGA Q-School, a $5,000 value. Brown advanced to the finals last year, finishing 84th.

• An annual seminar for Duramed Futures Tour rules official outlining how to handle difficult situations. “I’d like it to be called the Sarah Brown Seminar,” Keith Brown said.

“I went through a lot that day,” said Sarah Brown, who began the day at 5 under par, three shots off the lead, but was 2 over at the turn. “It was upsetting and humiliating for me to be in that situation.”

A spokeswoman for the Duramed Futures Tour would not comment on a proposed settlement but took responsibility for the mistake.

“We’ve owned up to our mistake and explained the situation to Sarah, but we do not plan to discuss any internal handling of the situation,” said Joely Pique, the tour’s public-relations manager.

The grooves rule was enacted by most major professional tours beginning this year to reduce spin on shots from the rough and emphasize driving accuracy. However, the Duramed Futures Tour delayed adopting the rule until July out of concern for its players being able to secure new equipment.

Brown’s wedge was stamped with an “XG” on the hosel (“X’’ indicating the Roman numeral 10 to signify 2010 and “G’’ for grooves), and the Web site indeed showed the wedge to be conforming. The wedge in question is the fifth of five Tour-W 54/10 (54 degrees of loft, 10 degrees of bounce) wedges listed on the Web site.

Keith Brown said he would like to avoid litigation, but “anything is on the table” if the Duramed Futures Tour does not agree to the conditions. Brown said he has been contacted by attorneys who read about the incident and are willing to take his case on contingency. Brown said the firms claim to be able to win a six-figure settlement.

“There are other people who’d go for the jugular,” Keith Brown said. “I don’t want any part of it. I don’t think that’s right. I’m not the McDonald’s lady with the cup of coffee.”

The Browns would like to be compensated with earnings equal to those for players who finished The International at 8 under par. Brown missed a 12-foot birdie putt as a rules official sifted through her bag, which was in Brown’s line of vision.

That putt would’ve put her at 4 under par. Brown’s best score on the back nine at Beaver Meadow Golf Course during the tournament was 4 under, Keith Brown said.

“There’s no guarantees, but they should give her the benefit of the doubt,” he said.

The Browns would like the earnings to count on the money list, if the additional earnings would bump her over any important thresholds. The top 90 on the money list earn Futures Tour status for 2011. The top five earn LPGA status, while Nos. 6-10 earn conditional status. Nos. 11-20 earn exemptions into the final stage of Q-School.

Brown is No. 106 on the Futures Tour money list, with $2,921. The Browns’ desired earnings from The International would give her $8,559 and move her to 48th in earnings.

Keith Brown also said that should Sarah Brown cross any thresholds with the additional earnings (i.e. top 20, top 90, etc.), they do not want another player bumped out of that threshold by Brown’s presence. In other words, the No. 90 finisher on the money list would remain No. 90 even if passed by Brown.

“I worked so hard to get where I wanted,” Sarah Brown said. She was a 2009 AJGA first-team All-American. “I got cheated out of my best finish (of my pro career) and my biggest paycheck. That was the hardest part.”
Logged
Captain Joesterio
HO Extraordinaire
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +2012/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
Cyprus Cyprus

Posts: 7446


My Bag Will Never Be Set!!


« Reply #15 on: July 29, 2010, 05:31:10 AM »

Quote
The Browns are asking for:

1 $5,638, the amount Sarah Brown would’ve earned had she finished The International at Concord at 8-under 208. She was 3 under par for the event when she was removed from the golf course with nine holes remaining.

2 A waiver of the entry fee to 2010 LPGA Q-School, a $5,000 value. Brown advanced to the finals last year, finishing 84th.

3 An annual seminar for Duramed Futures Tour rules official outlining how to handle difficult situations. “I’d like it to be called the Sarah Brown Seminar,” Keith Brown said.

1.  hmm...I cant see the tour giving her the money for her finishing at 8 under.  Unfortunately there is no way to know how she would have finished.  Give her the money for where she was at or 2500, whichever is greater.

2.  entry fee to q school?  ouch...I dont know about that.  What about the other players that need to qualify? 

3.  really?  a seminar?  are you sure you are not being a little retarded here dad? 

As for the numbnuts that made the decision, suspend him the rest of the  year and the first 5 events of next year. 

 
Logged
Jim Clark
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +15/-1
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 927



« Reply #16 on: July 29, 2010, 05:52:08 AM »

1.  hmm...I cant see the tour giving her the money for her finishing at 8 under.  Unfortunately there is no way to know how she would have finished.  Give her the money for where she was at or 2500, whichever is greater.

2.  entry fee to q school?  ouch...I dont know about that.  What about the other players that need to qualify? 

3.  really?  a seminar?  are you sure you are not being a little retarded here dad? 

As for the numbnuts that made the decision, suspend him the rest of the  year and the first 5 events of next year. 


Both those officials should probably be canned. It was an inexcusable mistake pulling her off the course. They should not have even looked at her bag or said anything until the round was over. A $5000 lump sum payment would seem fair with at least $2500 counting as official earnings.
Logged
rlheiman
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +83/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1359



WWW
« Reply #17 on: July 29, 2010, 06:12:59 AM »

I'm not sure the demands are completely fair, but at the same time, the money amounts are small by comparison.  People get 100's of thousands of things that are completely their own mistake, but someone calls it negligence and blames it on someone else.

This is clearly the tour officials' fault, the $10,000 the Browns are asking for is pretty reasonable if you ask me.  Duramed Futures Tour--Pay up!
Logged
Jaylasvegas
Guest
« Reply #18 on: July 29, 2010, 06:57:38 AM »

The so called officials are probably nothing more than local golf volunteers from the local section, the Futures tour doesnt have a payroll heavy enough to carry around travelling officials
Logged
Jim Clark
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +15/-1
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 927



« Reply #19 on: July 29, 2010, 12:15:13 PM »

The so called officials are probably nothing more than local golf volunteers from the local section, the Futures tour doesnt have a payroll heavy enough to carry around travelling officials

In this case, they are paid full-time employees.
Logged
Divot Dan
Acumen
GDS Guru
*

MoJo: +115/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
Mexico Mexico

Posts: 2403


El Bandito de Golf


« Reply #20 on: July 29, 2010, 12:33:58 PM »

In this case, they are paid full-time employees.
Pay Sarah the $5000 with half coming from the tour and the other half coming from the pay of the incompetent official(s) who made the call against her.
Logged
NewJerichoMan
The Poster F/K/A Knuckles
Acumen
GDS Guru
*

MoJo: +378/-2
Online Online

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 10722


Wait 'til Augusta


« Reply #21 on: July 29, 2010, 12:45:00 PM »

1.  hmm...I cant see the tour giving her the money for her finishing at 8 under.  Unfortunately there is no way to know how she would have finished.  Give her the money for where she was at or 2500, whichever is greater.

2.  entry fee to q school?  ouch...I dont know about that.  What about the other players that need to qualify? 

3.  really?  a seminar?  are you sure you are not being a little retarded here dad? 

As for the numbnuts that made the decision, suspend him the rest of the  year and the first 5 events of next year. 


I read Pops' statements much like you did.  He's a bit over-the-top.  On a second read though, he makes a decent case.  It sounds like if money was the end goal, he could ding them for a lot more, which I don't think it is.  I have no better answer than anyone else as to what should be the "best solution" but I know the father's isn't the worst solution.  $10 grand now or face a lawsuit you can't win, sounds like a no-brainer on the part of Duramed, IMHO. 
Logged
mr_divots
Independent Equipment Reviewer
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +216/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 11866


Keeping all bag options open. Always.


« Reply #22 on: July 29, 2010, 12:54:40 PM »

On a developmental tour where your place on the money list determines your ability to make a living, just handing someone $2K is only a band-aid.
Had she ended up with a good showing in the tournament, the money pertaining to the money list is far more valuable than any cash in hand. It very well could determine if she makes it to the big dance LPGA. The whole "rules seminar" to be named after his daughter is totally over the top, but the rest of it seems pretty reasonable, overall. His temper is likely running hot and he should have stepped back and thought about that rules seminar thing, as it comes off as petty and tarnishes the rest of it.
Logged
Divot Dan
Acumen
GDS Guru
*

MoJo: +115/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
Mexico Mexico

Posts: 2403


El Bandito de Golf


« Reply #23 on: July 29, 2010, 09:32:59 PM »

about that rules seminar thing, as it comes off as petty and tarnishes the rest of it.
As a dad of a beautiful daughter, I think I'd be as steamed about this as he was and I don't think his comments tarnish anything. It's not like he is Michelle Wie's dad.
Logged
Jim Clark
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +15/-1
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 927



« Reply #24 on: July 31, 2010, 05:34:00 AM »

They had no choice but to compensate her. I'm sure they were taking it on the chin on ALL the golf forums.

Sounds like everyone did the right thing. Dad didn't try for something ridiculous in litigation and the Tour obviously settled on an amount that both sides could live with and got it done quickly.

I'd still like to know who the snitch was.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2010, 10:47:15 AM by JLV » Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.274 seconds with 19 queries.