February 11, 2012, 11:05:31 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Reference CPM Chart - Feel Free to Add or ask questions  (Read 10210 times)
kcgolfclubs
Practice range
*

MoJo: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 13



WWW
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2009, 01:19:23 PM »

In order to achieve this, how do you change the tip trimming, and typically what iron do you use to 'start' with?

What has been your experience with slopes with smaller increments that 2 - 2.5 cpms?

I have my own database of shafts that I have collected over the years, and it has left me with a general idea as to which shaft(s) to start with to hit a specific frequency slope.  In general, I start with the three iron and work my way up to the wedges.  By tip trimming in 1/2" increments, most shafts will progress (get stiffer) by 4.5-5 CPMs.  In reference to your question about slopes with increments smaller than 2-2.5 CPMs, I am personally in that category.  I'm really rare, in that I'm considered a "flatliner," and therefore possess a flat frequency slope of 291 CPMs.  My swing load and unload timing is consistent throughout my entire set of irons and wedges.  I have found that less than 9% of the golfing public actually falls into that category.  I would have to say that probably two thirds of all golfers I have fit have a positive frequency slope that progresses by 2-2.5 CPMs between clubs.  Therefore, it would be my contention that if you started with a set of shafts and tip-trimmed them in 1/4" increments rather than 1/2" increments, you would (blindly) come closer to fitting more golfers.  I only say "blindly" because you wouldn't know exactly where to start in regard to the frequency spectrum.  Any clubmaker could make a set of clubs and precisely hit any frequency slope, but the real trick is in determining the appropriate frequency slope.  In my opinion, there is only one scientifically valid way to arrive at that slope.  There are, of course, ways to figure it based on trial and error, but it is not an exact science.  That said, there are a lot of phenomenal clubmakers who are very good at it.  Hopefully all that is clear as mud... 
Logged

Driver: Kenneth Smith 460cc Classic - Grafalloy Blue
Fairway Woods: Kenneth Smith 3 & 5 Woods - Grafalloy Blue
Irons: Kansas City KC-102 Muscleback Blades - Harrison Professional
Wedges: Kansas City Wedges 56* & 60* KCM Grinds
Putter: Kansas City Prototype Putter
kiwi
GDS Guru
*****

MoJo: +35/-0
Online Online

Gender: Male
New Zealand New Zealand

Posts: 2816



« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2009, 02:27:46 PM »



In order to compare flexes between manufacturers, the shaft's frequency needs to be measured. Frequency is the number of cycles per minute (CPM) or vibrations that the shaft has when the tip end is tweaked while the butt end of the shaft is firmly held at 5.25" from the butt end. A machine called a frequency analyzer is used to measure the shaft's CPM rating. The higher the CPM measurement, the stiffer the shaft is.





Thank you
Logged

All golf clubs are inherently evil.
vario
Sandbagger
*

MoJo: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #27 on: May 31, 2009, 01:33:52 AM »

With the latest shafts offering of stiff butt / active tip design, high MOI shaft, butt heavy, reinforced tip.......does all these parameter affect the measuring the cpm / flex for the various shaft and affecting the fitting process for golfers as according to swing speed?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.26 seconds with 18 queries.