choeppner99
Putter Whore
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +66/-0
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 1781
Let's Talk Putters!!!!!!
|
 |
« on: November 30, 2007, 10:11:00 AM » |
|
Hey Guys,
Just Curious as to see what the most common stroke is here. Meaning, Do you have a Straight-Back-Straight-Thru Stroke, or do you have a Gated Stroke
Now..Which Type of putter do you use. Examples:
1) Heel Toe Weighted plumber neck 2) Heel Toe Weighted 1.5 Neck 2) Face Balanced 3) Heel Toe Weighted - Center Shaft 4) Center Shaft Face Balanced 5) Face Balanced No Neck 6) Heel Toe Weighted No Neck
I know I am an Anomoly. I have a SBST stroke, but I use a HT weighted putter.
What do the rest of yall use?
-CHRIS-
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My Current WITB
Driver - Taylor Made Tour Burner TP With ENZO Zone 70 3 Wood - Taylor Made Tour Burner with GD YS-6 Hybrid - TM Burner TP W/ Aerotech Steel Fiber 4-PW - SCRATCH TC-1 Customs in Antique Finish with Aerotech Steel Fiber 52 - SCRATCH Tour Department 56 - SCRATCH Tour Department 60 - SCRATCH Tour Department Putter - Machine GARAGE Putter Bag - MACHINE Red Staff Bag
|
|
|
Desmond
Greenskeeper
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +177/-1
Online
Posts: 11740
Facilitator
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2007, 10:25:06 AM » |
|
Chris -- I generated a poll for you.
You can edit it, add to it, or delete it as you wish.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In the Bag: Adams 9088UL w/ Fuji Blur 55 R ● TM R11 Ti 5 wd w/ Fuji Blur 55 ●TM R11 Ti 7 wd w/ Fubuki AX ● Bobby Jones 22, 25 w/ Aerotech i75 Hy ● Miura PP-9003 6-PW w/ Aerotech i80 ● Miura Y 49, Miura K 55, Miura C 59 w/DG Spinners ● Edel Vari-Loft Putter
|
|
|
Desmond
Greenskeeper
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +177/-1
Online
Posts: 11740
Facilitator
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2007, 10:28:21 AM » |
|
The present gamer is a SeeMore mFGP -- it is a blade type style that is center-shafted weighted toe down.
The putting stroke is Pat O'Brien's -- which has no moving parts other than the shoulders moving around you - -back and thru stroke. It is a take on the traditional gated or arc stroke -- so the toe down blade is compatible with the stroke.
Generally --
Toe Down = Some Variation of an Arc Stroke
Face Balanced = SBST, but can be Arc, too. (it depends on the player)
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 30, 2007, 11:28:41 AM by SwingMan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hungsolo
Often Wrong, Never in Doubt.
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +366/-1
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 8589
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2007, 10:57:59 AM » |
|
I have a gated stroke, don't know if it's an OBrienGate, or an UtleyGate, but it swings.
I prefer the Heel Toe weighted Plumbers neck style of putter, and my gamer is my mills softtail custom with a plumber's neck. I am looking for a plumber's neck mallet that is very slightly toe down, just for giggles.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jdhill
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +24/-0
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 2753
Freedom Isn't Free
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2007, 11:11:57 AM » |
|
I use something akin to the O'Brien stroke... My Martinique is fairly well toe weighted (about 5:30), the 2-bar (center shafted) less so (about 4:00).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The Bag: Driver -  909D2 4-wood -  r7 st 16º 7-wood -  r7 st 21º Irons -  AR-1’s w/ SteelFiber i110cw’s (4-W) (assembled by Frank aka camster8) G/SW -  JLM-TNC 53º LW -  58° EEG (  x-forged c-grind 58º and  JLM-TNC 58º in reserve) Putter - Byron Morgan 007 (thx turfsurfer.com & GD)
|
|
|
SC Golfer
Judge Smails Courtroom
GDS Guru
 
MoJo: +38/-0
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 1924
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2007, 11:14:18 AM » |
|
using the shoulders only gate stroke. Currently I have 2 gamers as I am still trying different weight combos in my Mentor Quadra and Wishon Center Shafted 6 series.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
glebert
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2007, 11:19:29 AM » |
|
Hey, someone put in the "wristy" option just for me! As for my putter, I have no idea what some of those terms mean. I use a semi-mallet on a plumbers neck. Similar to this one  -greg
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Desmond
Greenskeeper
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +177/-1
Online
Posts: 11740
Facilitator
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2007, 11:30:41 AM » |
|
Hey, someone put in the "wristy" option just for me! As for my putter, I have no idea what some of those terms mean. I use a semi-mallet on a plumbers neck. Similar to this one  -greg Yeah,  I see the older guys at the club using the "wristy" stroke -- so it's still not extinct -- yet.  When it's not working for them, they tend to change their grip instead of their stroke.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
glebert
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2007, 11:39:00 AM » |
|
Yeah,  I see the older guys at the club using the "wristy" stroke -- so it's still not extinct -- yet.  When it's not working for them, they tend to change their grip instead of their stroke. Well, I turn 35 in two weeks, and I plan to golf well into my 90's, so I think it will be a while before it becomes extinct. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
app4dstn
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2007, 12:24:00 PM » |
|
arc'd gate. a few Newport 2 style necks. a couple of face balanced mallets. a couple of no-offset heel shafted's. used to have an Odyssey #9 (phil mick flange). newport 2 works best (w/ that offset), but i strive to rotate to keep from getting stale.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mr_divots
Independent Equipment Reviewer
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +216/-0
Offline
Gender:
 United States
Posts: 11866
Keeping all bag options open. Always.
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2007, 12:37:09 PM » |
|
H/T with a slant neck.
I think I had been under the delusion that I was a SBST putter all these years and kept using face-balanced mallets and blades. I tend to lose it right with the plumbers neck, left with a center shaft. The slant neck has worked well. I have a very slight gate to my stroke it would seem, and the more offset nature of the slant neck helps me square up the face and also put a more upward strike on the ball at impact. I still have to learn to trust my reads better, but I really feel my stroke has improved, and especially my distance control, since going to this style of putter.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
burns9304
Golf Addict
  
MoJo: +8/-0
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 545
Stupid like a fox
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2007, 04:32:57 PM » |
|
Gated Stroke with a Heel Toe Weighted 1.5 Neck putter
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Driver- Taylor Made Superdeep TP 10.5* Mitsubishi Kai'li 70x 3 wood- Tour Edge Exotics CB3 Tour 15* Mitsubishi Fubuki 83x 18* Hybrid- Adams Idea Pro Gold Project X HC1 3-PW- Callaway RAZR X Musclebacks KBS Tour X 52*- Taylor Made xFt Project X 6.0 58*- Cleveland 588 Forged Putter- Kevin Burns 704
|
|
|
Dave1
Tour Player
 
MoJo: +8/-0
Offline
Posts: 179
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2007, 09:13:59 PM » |
|
SBST low hand low.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jetlv25
Administrator
GDS Guru
MoJo: +139/-0
Offline
Posts: 6562
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2007, 09:37:12 PM » |
|
I'm afraid i'm stuck between a gated stroke and a STST swing..........depends on the day, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sometimes the most expensive is not the best, sometimes it is nothing more than the most expensive.
|
|
|
hifish
Weekend Golfer
MoJo: +0/-0
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 27
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2007, 01:08:21 AM » |
|
I attempt to do a Pat O'Brien type putting stroke. I am definitely shoulders only but somehow do not always complete my follow through. Consequently some of my putts seem like taps. I am just about to use a SeeMore putter with the large grip so I'll see if that gets me putting properly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Current Bag: Bobby Jones 10.5* JR6 Taylormade Series 200 3W Bobby Jones 5W Bobby Jones Hybrid 21* & 25* Taylormade R7 TP 5 - PW Srixon 52* & 58* Wedges SeeMore m5 Prototype Handicap R&A 4.3
|
|
|
Clemsonfan
Weekend Golfer
MoJo: +1/-0
Offline
Posts: 26
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: December 01, 2007, 07:18:49 AM » |
|
I use a center-shafted Mentor Triad II and make a slightly arced stroke, so I voted SBST. My arc is modest, at best.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Desmond
Greenskeeper
GDS Guru
   
MoJo: +177/-1
Online
Posts: 11740
Facilitator
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: December 01, 2007, 07:21:57 AM » |
|
Off Topic Comment -- maybe we need to discuss the sbst method in another thread -- I've always thought (and heard) that the SBST centered around a manipulation of the hands in order to maintain the SBST - if you hands are quiet during the stroke without manipulation (unless your spine is parallel to the ground and you only move your arms or a combo of arms/shoulders), you've got an arc, slight or not.
But heck - I don't know anything about SBST because I've never taken an interest in it.
Now back to our regularly scheduled thread.
I've begun another thread on sbst -- please post on SBST techniques in that thread.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 01, 2007, 11:43:28 AM by SwingMan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Clemsonfan
Weekend Golfer
MoJo: +1/-0
Offline
Posts: 26
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: December 01, 2007, 07:25:00 AM » |
|
I don't know how to copy your post into mine, Swingman, but based on your criteria I a am an arc putter. My hands are as quiet as a church mouse.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bogeycentral
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2007, 08:47:10 AM » |
|
I always thought that I was a straight back with a little arc towards the end. I guess I was wrong as I did a mini putter fitting last night on the TOMI machine and was blown away. My tempo is a little off but my stroke is what amazed me. I am a Billy Maifar(sp) putter though. I have an outside in swing path that is about 2.6 degrees which surprised me. But my aim at impact was anywhere from .3 degrees to .6 degrees offline to the left. Somwhere in my swing the compensation is proving useful. Not sure what does it but time to not change as the fitter said that was remarkable considering the stroke path. That was my first time ever putting with my jumbo tiger shark grip. The putter is a guerrin rife aussie putter with a little bit of toe hang.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EXMAX
Weekend Golfer
MoJo: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 36
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: December 09, 2007, 02:41:28 PM » |
|
dont use the tomi if you want accurate measurements
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bogeycentral
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2007, 11:25:45 PM » |
|
dont use the tomi if you want accurate measurements
Why is that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MentorSports
Golf Addict
  
MoJo: +5/-0
Offline
Posts: 429
MentorSports
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2007, 11:05:26 AM » |
|
dont use the tomi if you want accurate measurements
Why is that? Here's the dirt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EXMAX
Weekend Golfer
MoJo: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 36
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2007, 02:21:42 PM » |
|
been to 3 trade shows and never seen it working on 1 demo where one unit was working there seemed to be something strange going on if you make your normal stroke on the first putt, then 4 wierd and wonderful ones - they all show up similar to the first
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bargolf
Weekend Golfer
MoJo: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 48
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: December 17, 2007, 02:35:59 AM » |
|
I always thought that I was a straight back with a little arc towards the end. I guess I was wrong as I did a mini putter fitting last night on the TOMI machine and was blown away. My tempo is a little off but my stroke is what amazed me. I am a Billy Maifar(sp) putter though. I have an outside in swing path that is about 2.6 degrees which surprised me. But my aim at impact was anywhere from .3 degrees to .6 degrees offline to the left. Somwhere in my swing the compensation is proving useful. Not sure what does it but time to not change as the fitter said that was remarkable considering the stroke path. That was my first time ever putting with my jumbo tiger shark grip. The putter is a guerrin rife aussie putter with a little bit of toe hang.
Full agreement about Tomi, but not surprised about outside in stroke or face open to the path as compensation. Pretty common, especially for players who try to put their eyes directly over the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EXMAX
Weekend Golfer
MoJo: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 36
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: December 17, 2007, 01:47:49 PM » |
|
eyes don't necessarily have to be over the ball or inside the ball - just in a constant fixed position however the closer you are to being over the ball has the effect of producing a shallower movement pattern and if you do multiply face angle then your doing it with less variable. plus most peoples perception of what is "eyes over the ball" isn't correct
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|